Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

My Shifting Perceptions of GM

As originally published on AskPatty.com.


Shh My first car ever was a Chevy Geo Prizm. I still remember it fondly, as any “first” tends to be.

But then I watched the DVD “Who Killed The Electric Car?” This documentary chronicles the saga of the first GM electric car, the EV1. Its debut lease program was greeted with adoration and the EV1 quickly built a loyal fan base that included celebrities, environmental activists, and regular Janes and Joes lucky enough to lay a hand on these pure electric cars. They were none too happy when GM decided to stop renewing the leases, and mounted a resistance to prevent GM from taking back the cars, and later, crushing all that were returned. That made me mad.

When I first started writing for AskPatty.com, the images of the DVD were hard to erase. I was psyched to be writing about cleaner cars and better fuels, and do my own little part for the environment. But at the back of my mind, there was a doubt about cars, in general, that I could not erase. Cars definitely cause me a lot of conflicts. A necessary evil, as my first blog ruminated.

Then one day as an AskPatty blogger, I was invited to a participate in the GM "Electric Drive University," a press event to test drive the Project Driveway Equinox, a hydrogen fuel-cell car that was being tested, once again, with lucky consumers in Los Angeles and New York area. I was a skeptic when I got there, wary of the intention of publicity events but was willing to see what this new development was about. The event was a turning point for me. There, I learned about GM’s energy diversity approach, met staff who seemed genuinely enthusiastic and excited about alternative, cleaner car technology. Of course, GM is great at hosting press events – we were treated like VIPs with excellent door-to-door service, great accommodations, and delicious food. The “University” was very educational. In fact, when I got home, my friends told me that I had been brainwashed. I admit I did get quite influenced by the well-trained GM folks who said all the right things about the Chevy Volt, about their path to cleaner cars, but hey, companies can reform. We should give such companies a chance and help them move forward on socially responsible path.

Later, I talked to my professor at the Presidio School of Management – Hunter Lovins, one of the pillars of sustainability, and author of Natural Capitalism -- the bible of the sustainability movement. Even she had a fairly positive opinion of GM, so I started feeling a bit more positive about them.

That is – until last week. I read a shocking article about GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz comment that global warming is a “total crock of shit”. I couldn't believe my eyes. That’s a bit frank, isn’t it? Especially when your company is publicly committed about energy diversity and has spent tremendous sums promoting its green image, marketing its fuel-cell future car. That comment reignited my nagging doubt once more.

Then last week, I chanced upon a Business Week article about companies being half-heartedly green. In “Green—Up to a Point,” the author laid out the case of how some companies in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), which has publicly endorsed emission cuts, are also “simultaneously supporting efforts and organizations that oppose mandatory cuts in greenhouse gases or promote policies that would make the USCAP reductions nearly impossible to meet.” For example, GM and Chrysler also support the Heartland Institute, which disputes man’s role in global warming. This makes me mad.

Adding fire to the fuel (to my own feelings about GM), apparently GM and Toyota are now expressing “doubts about the viability of hydrogen fuel cells for mass-market production in the near term and suggested their companies are now betting that electric cars will prove to be a better way to reduce fuel consumption and cut tailpipe emissions on a large scale,” according to Wall Street Journal. So much for a 2010 target date!

All these developments make me really sad, and ever more cynical about big American automakers It is too bad GM has squandered my hard-earned trust. They have been doing so well, in my opinion, and in many environmentalist's opinions… but are they really just playing both sides? When will those cleaner cars materialize? I will believe them again when I see a real car in the market with alternative fuel engines. In the mean time, I will keep looking for a car company I can conscientiously devote my loyalty to.



Monday, December 31, 2007

A Twist for A New Year Resolution

As originally published on AskPatty.com, under the title "Women and Cars: The Psychology of Global Warming".

Ferrari

Here is an entertaining New Year resolution that we women could adopt to help fight climate change. What’s more, it seems like it will makes for a lively conversation topic with girlfriends!

Recently, Britain’s top government scientist, Professor Sir David King of Cambridge University, was quoted as saying that if women stop admiring guys with fast and sexy cars, the world could be a greener place. An advocate for individuals to assume more personal responsibilities in fighting climate change, he was asked at a lecture by a young woman what she could do. His advice? “Stop admiring young men in Ferrari's.” Instead, admire people who conserve energy.

What an interesting take. Although a bit flippant, he does have a point. Our mindset determines the kind of world we live in. It is all in the attitude.

Personally, I too am an advocate for individuals being more aware of the impact of their personal actions on the environment. That was the reason I originally started writing my blog. Little decisions that we make regarding our choices in daily life can make a huge difference, even if the benefits are not readily apparent. After embarking on my personal journey for making changes in my personal life to be more sustainable, I found that every little action became a little seed that further opened my eye to more possibilities in the world. I kept learning about the world, which is fun, and renew the sense of awe that I had lost after childhood.

Mother Theresa once said, “Don’t wait for leaders. Do it individually, one person at a time." Personally, I made some small changes that added up to a lot, in the end. It started with being conscious of my car usage and writing a blog about the topic (which happily got me a gig writing for AskPatty). I have learned so much about alternative cars and fuels. Then I converted to solar power (thanks to my fiances' persistence), requested a worm bin for composting as Christmas gift, and enrolled in a sustainable MBA program so I could be in jobs that make a difference. Each step made me feel good, and each step was a learning experience. This Christmas, I gave green services as presents (e.g. GreenDimes.com, Kiva.org) instead of goods, after watching the short movie “The Story of Stuff”. So Professor King’s suggestion was exciting to me, because unlike my green adventure so far which was mainly stuff-related, he is suggesting some psychology to go with it.

Obviously, Professor King’s quote angered Ferrari owners and sports car racers, which is understandable. But the fact remains -- those fast cars have really low mileage. That means more fossil fuel used, which is the greatest contributor to greenhouse gas. (Click on the graph below for the breakdown.) However, if electric sports car, such as the Tesla Roadster are more widely used – I think Professor King will approve of women admiring such race car drivers. :-) Well, really there is nothing wrong with liking the look of muscle cars. In fact, I admire the look of the Lotus and Lamborghini very much. However, there is no waay I will let my vanity contribute to climate change. I strongly agree with the professor that we all have levers. Similar to the concept of voting with our purses, we can vote for goodness in the world with our heart. He said: admire guys who are into a sustainable lifestyle. I like that. We women are known to be emotional, so why not let our emotions help fight climate change?

Interestingly, the article also mentioned that although 77% of the population in U.S. believe in climate change, only 40% believe that it is due to human activities. However, if you look at the EPA figure below, the chart clearly shows that human-related activities, especially transportation and electricity contribute the most to greenhouse gases. Now, even if you think that the professor’s comment is a little chauvinistic, don’t you think he has a point?

Pie Chart: This graph clearly shows the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas emission, from human activities.

Emission_2

Sunday, September 9, 2007

My car and my conscience

This post was recently published on AskPatty.com! I am now a Contributing Editor at this neat website on automotive advice for women.

Cars -- one of the biggest contributors of greenhouse gas emission and hence global warming. I am rather unhappy that a car is indispensable to life in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is unbelievable how many cars are constantly on the road, and how much land needs to be devoted to parking. Prior to SF, I lived for many years in Manhattan, where almost everything is within walking distance from a subway stop. Didn't have a car for 6 years -- because I didn't need it. However, like most of America, SF suburbs are typical of urban sprawl, making cars indispensable to an efficient daily life. Although I have come to like my car very much, today's automobiles simply exert too high a cost to the environment -- not to mention, an increasing burden on our wallets. So I started thinking about my driving patterns and where I can reduce my carbon footprint.

Breaking it down, here's my weekly driving needs:

  • Commute to work (40 miles/week)
  • Get lunch and coffee (20 miles/week)
  • Necessary appointments (40 miles/week)
  • Driving to friends' place (20 miles/week)
  • Other roamings (100 miles/week)

Total per week = 220 miles
Total per year = 11,400 miles (average American drives 12K miles per year)
Gasoline Per Week = 7.85 gallon (2006 Honda Civic which averages 28mpg average city)
Gasoline Cost Per Year = $1127/year ($3/gallon)

CO2 Emission = 6710 lbs per year! [Calculator]

I want to reduce my car usage... as difficult as it is in the Bay Area. So I bought a bike recently. I started cycling to work, to the farmers' market, and the library. Soon I hope to ride the train+cycle to school. My fitness has increased when I converted some of the commuting to pedal power... although there are days (60%) where my schedule and logistics simply necessitate car use (a necessary evil). On those days, my personal obsession is to use today's car technology more efficiently.

  • Buy the most gas efficient car I can afford. My 2006 Honda Civic averages 25-29 mpg across town. Wish I'd spent the extra $5K to get a hybrid, with gasoline prices now skyrocketing. It would have made me feel better about using this car too, by reducing my personal "cognitive dissonance" between what I think is right, versus what I actually do. My next car would definitely be at least a hybrid...
  • Turn off the A/C. Use the vent or open windows for outside air. Works well 80% of the time since the weather here is usually cool. Bad idea when it is 80+F or the vehicle in front emits smelly fumes. However, the resistance created by wind may negate fuel savings, thus this definitely won't work on the highway. Yep, it also means that my passengers sometimes get a little uncomfortable temperature-wise... not the greatest solution.
  • Increase gas mileage [great tips here]
  • Live closer to work: within biking / walking distance... I moved closer, though my company may relocate further away soon...
  • Car-pool to work: I used to car pool about 3x/week when I lived further away. Co-ordinating schedule requires a commitment, and some sacrifice to mobility when one doesn't have a car at the office. But the benefits are worth it -- driving time = bonding time, HOV lane, and better conscience. Plus, within your carpool group, try to use the more gas-efficient car more frequently to compound the effects of savings. This may be unfair to those with a hybrid or high-mileage car... so discuss it first.
  • Being in a small startup, there's no cafeteria. Nearest food place takes 25 minutes to walk to... So, I pack a lunch and make coffee in the office. It saves time and is healthier too!

I am well-aware that at some point, one starts being penny-wise, pound foolish. What is your thought on this? Your personal experience with such a journey? I'd like to hear! Meanwhile, happy traveling!


-Marn Yee